<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Python vs Ruby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fxposter.org/2007/06/16/python-vs-ruby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fxposter.org/2007/06/16/python-vs-ruby/</link>
	<description>Stories about Ruby, JavaScript, Objective-C and other cool tools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:45:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FX Poster</title>
		<link>http://blog.fxposter.org/2007/06/16/python-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>FX Poster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fxposter.org/2007/06/16/python-vs-ruby/#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>Пасиб, почитаем.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Пасиб, почитаем.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: игорь</title>
		<link>http://blog.fxposter.org/2007/06/16/python-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-1769</link>
		<dc:creator>игорь</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 21:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fxposter.org/2007/06/16/python-vs-ruby/#comment-1769</guid>
		<description>адекватного ничего.
пишут в основном люди которые сделали выбор.
допустим тут 
http://rbazinet.wordpress.com/2006/08/02/the-python-vs-ruby-debate-and-learning-a-new-programming-language/
http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2006/08/01/Python-vs-Ruby
выбрали руби поэтому питом конечно плох. а тут наоборот http://blog.cbcg.net/articles/2007/04/22/python-up-ruby-down-if-that-runtime-dont-work-then-its-bound-to-drizzown
http://jesusphreak.infogami.com/blog/why_py</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>адекватного ничего.<br />
пишут в основном люди которые сделали выбор.<br />
допустим тут<br />
<a href="http://rbazinet.wordpress.com/2006/08/02/the-python-vs-ruby-debate-and-learning-a-new-programming-language/" rel="nofollow">http://rbazinet.wordpress.com/2006/08/02/the-python-vs-ruby-debate-and-learning-a-new-programming-language/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2006/08/01/Python-vs-Ruby" rel="nofollow">http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2006/08/01/Python-vs-Ruby</a><br />
выбрали руби поэтому питом конечно плох. а тут наоборот <a href="http://blog.cbcg.net/articles/2007/04/22/python-up-ruby-down-if-that-runtime-dont-work-then-its-bound-to-drizzown" rel="nofollow">http://blog.cbcg.net/articles/2007/04/22/python-up-ruby-down-if-that-runtime-dont-work-then-its-bound-to-drizzown</a><br />
<a href="http://jesusphreak.infogami.com/blog/why_py" rel="nofollow">http://jesusphreak.infogami.com/blog/why_py</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackYF</title>
		<link>http://blog.fxposter.org/2007/06/16/python-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>JackYF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fxposter.org/2007/06/16/python-vs-ruby/#comment-828</guid>
		<description>Кстати, да, тоже было бы интересно :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Кстати, да, тоже было бы интересно :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: blog.fxposter.org @ 2012-02-11 01:30:22 -->
